On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:28:01 +0100
Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> On Dienstag, 19. Januar 2021 15:34:07 CET Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:31:26 +0100
> >
> > Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> > > On Montag, 18. Januar 2021 15:22:59 CET Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > > The fid_list is currently open-coded. This doesn't seem to serve any
> > > > purpose that cannot be met with QEMU's generic lists. Let's go for a
> > > > QSIMPLEQ : this will allow to add new fids at the end of the list and
> > > > to improve the logic in v9fs_mark_fids_unreclaim().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org>
> > >
> > > In general LGTM hence:
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com>
> > >
> > > Some comments below ...
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > hw/9pfs/9p.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> > > > hw/9pfs/9p.h | 4 ++--
> > > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p.c b/hw/9pfs/9p.c
> > > > index 37c3379b7462..b65f320e6518 100644
> > > > --- a/hw/9pfs/9p.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/9pfs/9p.c
> > > > @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static V9fsFidState *coroutine_fn get_fid(V9fsPDU
> > > > *pdu,
> > > > int32_t fid) V9fsFidState *f;
> > > >
> > > > V9fsState *s = pdu->s;
> > > >
> > > > - for (f = s->fid_list; f; f = f->next) {
> > > > + QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH(f, &s->fid_list, next) {
> > > >
> > > > BUG_ON(f->clunked);
> > > > if (f->fid == fid) {
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > >
> > > > @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static V9fsFidState *alloc_fid(V9fsState *s, int32_t
> > > > fid) {
> > > >
> > > > V9fsFidState *f;
> > > >
> > > > - for (f = s->fid_list; f; f = f->next) {
> > > > + QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH(f, &s->fid_list, next) {
> > > >
> > > > /* If fid is already there return NULL */
> > > > BUG_ON(f->clunked);
> > > > if (f->fid == fid) {
> > > >
> > > > @@ -311,8 +311,7 @@ static V9fsFidState *alloc_fid(V9fsState *s, int32_t
> > > > fid) * reclaim won't close the file descriptor
> > > >
> > > > */
> > > >
> > > > f->flags |= FID_REFERENCED;
> > > >
> > > > - f->next = s->fid_list;
> > > > - s->fid_list = f;
> > > > + QSIMPLEQ_INSERT_HEAD(&s->fid_list, f, next);
> > >
> > > Not related to this series, but I wonder why queue.h wraps everything
> > > into:
> > >
> > > do {
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > } while (0);
> >
> > Note, this is do { ... } while (0) *without* the trailing semi-colon, which
> > is the corner stone of this trick.
>
> Yes, I got that. What I meant was, unless I am missing something, a simple
> compound statement (without trailing semi-colon) a.k.a. a 'block' is the more
> common way to handle this, like:
>
> #define QSIMPLEQ_INIT(head) { \
> (head)->sqh_first = NULL; \
> (head)->sqh_last = &(head)->sqh_first; \
> }
>
No this isn't the more common way because it doesn't work with
if...else statements, i.e.
if (some_condition)
QSIMPLEQ_INIT(&head);
else
do_some_other_stuff()
has illagal syntax because of the semi-colon.
Of course, since the QEMU coding styles mandates { } in if...else
statements, your suggestion should just work, but do { } while(0)
doesn't do harm (compilers optimize that flawlessly) and it is
so commonly used elsewhere that I don't think its worth changing.
> Third patch tomorrow ... thanks Greg!
>
> Best regards,
> Christian Schoenebeck
>
>
