Am 16.02.2021 um 16:14 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben: > Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> writes: > > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> > [...] > > diff --git a/tests/qapi-schema/alias-name-bad-type.err > > b/tests/qapi-schema/alias-name-bad-type.err > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000..489f45ff9b > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tests/qapi-schema/alias-name-bad-type.err > > @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ > > +alias-name-bad-type.json: In struct 'AliasStruct0': > > +alias-name-bad-type.json:1: alias member 'name' requires a string name > > Would "'aliases' member 'name'..." be more consistent?
'aliases' is a list, not a single alias definition, so technically it would have to be "'aliases' member member 'name'...", which I feel is a bit too confusing. I think I have consistently used "alias" for "'aliases' member" everywhere, though. At least, that was the intention. Kevin
