From: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

The implementation of the XICS interrupt controller contains several
(difficult to trigger) bugs due to the fact that we were not 100%
consistent with which irq numbering we used.  In most places, global
numbers were used as handled by the presentation layer, however a few
functions took "local" numberings, that is the source number within
the interrupt source controller which is offset from the global
number.  In most cases the function and its caller agreed on this, but
in a few cases it didn't.

This patch cleans this up by always using global numbering.
Translation to the local number is now always and only done when we
look up the individual interrupt source state structure.  This should
remove the existing bugs and with luck reduce the chances of
re-introducing such bugs.

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
---
 hw/xics.c |   17 ++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/xics.c b/hw/xics.c
index 9bf82aa..bd8d4cd 100644
--- a/hw/xics.c
+++ b/hw/xics.c
@@ -187,17 +187,17 @@ static int ics_valid_irq(struct ics_state *ics, uint32_t 
nr)
         && (nr < (ics->offset + ics->nr_irqs));
 }
 
-static void ics_set_irq_msi(void *opaque, int nr, int val)
+static void ics_set_irq_msi(void *opaque, int srcno, int val)
 {
     struct ics_state *ics = (struct ics_state *)opaque;
-    struct ics_irq_state *irq = ics->irqs + nr;
+    struct ics_irq_state *irq = ics->irqs + srcno;
 
     if (val) {
         if (irq->priority == 0xff) {
             irq->masked_pending = 1;
             /* masked pending */ ;
         } else  {
-            icp_irq(ics->icp, irq->server, nr + ics->offset, irq->priority);
+            icp_irq(ics->icp, irq->server, srcno + ics->offset, irq->priority);
         }
     }
 }
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static void ics_resend_msi(struct ics_state *ics)
 static void ics_write_xive_msi(struct ics_state *ics, int nr, int server,
                                uint8_t priority)
 {
-    struct ics_irq_state *irq = ics->irqs + nr;
+    struct ics_irq_state *irq = ics->irqs + nr - ics->offset;
 
     irq->server = server;
     irq->priority = priority;
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static void ics_write_xive_msi(struct ics_state *ics, int 
nr, int server,
     }
 
     irq->masked_pending = 0;
-    icp_irq(ics->icp, server, nr + ics->offset, priority);
+    icp_irq(ics->icp, server, nr, priority);
 }
 
 static void ics_reject(struct ics_state *ics, int nr)
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static void rtas_set_xive(sPAPREnvironment *spapr, uint32_t 
token,
         return;
     }
 
-    ics_write_xive_msi(ics, nr - ics->offset, server, priority);
+    ics_write_xive_msi(ics, nr, server, priority);
 
     rtas_st(rets, 0, 0); /* Success */
 }
@@ -388,7 +388,7 @@ static void rtas_int_off(sPAPREnvironment *spapr, uint32_t 
token,
     struct ics_irq_state *irq = xics->irqs + (nr - xics->offset);
 
     irq->saved_priority = irq->priority;
-    ics_write_xive_msi(xics, nr - xics->offset, irq->server, 0xff);
+    ics_write_xive_msi(xics, nr, irq->server, 0xff);
 #endif
 
     rtas_st(rets, 0, 0); /* Success */
@@ -418,8 +418,7 @@ static void rtas_int_on(sPAPREnvironment *spapr, uint32_t 
token,
 #if 0
     struct ics_irq_state *irq = xics->irqs + (nr - xics->offset);
 
-    ics_write_xive_msi(xics, nr - xics->offset,
-                       irq->server, irq->saved_priority);
+    ics_write_xive_msi(xics, nr, irq->server, irq->saved_priority);
 #endif
 
     rtas_st(rets, 0, 0); /* Success */
-- 
1.6.0.2


Reply via email to