On 09/15/2011 01:08 AM, ronnie sahlberg wrote:
I think it is reasonable to just not support iscsi at all for blocksize that is not multiple of 512 bytes since a read-modify-write cycle across a network would probably be prohibitively expensive.
Agreed.
.bdrv_flush() I can easily add a synchronous implementation of this unless your patch is expected to be merged in the near future.
We need the same patch for NBD, so I wouldn't bother with the synchronous flush.
Paolo
