On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:31:22 +0100 Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> On Montag, 1. Februar 2021 14:37:02 CET qemu_oss--- via wrote: > > On Montag, 1. Februar 2021 13:26:49 CET Greg Kurz wrote: > > > > > I agree that a bunch of other things should be documented, but that's > > > > > definitely a great start. Thanks for doing this ! > > > > > > > > > > Just one remark on the topology diagram: > > > > > > > > > > https://wiki.qemu.org/File:9pfs_topology.png > > > > > > > > > > It gives the impression that the 9p transport and server can > > > > > handle multiple guests, which they certainly don't : each > > > > > 9p server lives in exactly one device which is exposed to > > > > > exactly one guest. > > > > > > > > Right, I haven't considered that the diagram might be interpreted that > > > > way. My primary intention was to show the 3 main components of 9pfs from > > > > design perspective and secondary showing that multiple guests can share > > > > storage. > > > > > > > > So what would be better: a) duplicating the server side in the diagram > > > > (then the image might become a bit large in height), b) dropping the > > > > multiple guests, c) making the issue with server instances clear in the > > > > text? > > > > > > I'd rather go for b) > > > > Updated the diagram on the wiki page. > > > > To keep noise low, I won't send emails on further changes to that wiki page. > > If you want to be auto notified then just add yourself to the watch list > > there. > > Ok, I think I'm done with this page: > https://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/9p > > At least I think I've described everything I wanted to from my side regarding > current 9p status. > Great thanks for doing this ! I'll have a look ASAP. Cheers, -- Greg > Best regards, > Christian Schoenebeck > >
