Jan Kiszka writes: > On 2011-09-16 19:01, Lluís Vilanova wrote: >> Mimics the already-existing "qemu_init_vcpu".
> Bad name as it implies something important happens inside. Call it > trace_reset_vcpu because that is what it will do. I just thought it is much cleaner to call a generic "qemu_reset_vcpu" function that _might_ do something related to resetting the vCPU state, regardless of whether there is a tracing event for it or not. Otherwise if someone wants to add some generic vCPU-resetting code in the future, the tracing function might end up in the target-specific code instead of the generic qemu code. If you still think this is a bad idea I'll resend a patch with both events renamed into trace_vcpu_init/trace_vcpu_reset. Thanks, Lluis -- "And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn something new, the whole world becomes that much richer." -- The Princess of Pure Reason, as told by Norton Juster in The Phantom Tollbooth