On 3/18/21 4:56 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 18/03/2021 à 16:51, Laurent Vivier a écrit :
>> Le 18/03/2021 à 16:36, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
>>> On 3/18/21 11:06 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>> Le 18/03/2021 à 11:02, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
>>>>> On 3/18/21 10:52 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>>>> Le 18/03/2021 à 10:19, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
>>>>>>> Hi Laurent,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +Paolo / Thomas
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/15/21 9:42 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>>>>>> The machine is based on Goldfish interfaces defined by Google
>>>>>>>> for Android simulator. It uses Goldfish-rtc (timer and RTC),
>>>>>>>> Goldfish-pic (PIC) and Goldfish-tty (for serial port and early tty).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The machine is created with 128 virtio-mmio bus, and they can
>>>>>>>> be used to use serial console, GPU, disk, NIC, HID, ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu>
>>>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
>>>>>>>> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
>>>>>>>> Message-Id: <20210312214145.2936082-6-laur...@vivier.eu>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>  default-configs/devices/m68k-softmmu.mak      |   1 +
>>>>>>>>  .../standard-headers/asm-m68k/bootinfo-virt.h |  18 +
>>>>>>>>  hw/m68k/virt.c                                | 313 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>  MAINTAINERS                                   |  13 +
>>>>>>>>  hw/m68k/Kconfig                               |   9 +
>>>>>>>>  hw/m68k/meson.build                           |   1 +
>>>>>>>>  6 files changed, 355 insertions(+)
>>>>>>>>  create mode 100644 include/standard-headers/asm-m68k/bootinfo-virt.h
>>>>>>>>  create mode 100644 hw/m68k/virt.c
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/hw/m68k/Kconfig b/hw/m68k/Kconfig
>>>>>>>> index 60d7bcfb8f2b..f839f8a03064 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/hw/m68k/Kconfig
>>>>>>>> +++ b/hw/m68k/Kconfig
>>>>>>>> @@ -23,3 +23,12 @@ config Q800
>>>>>>>>      select ESP
>>>>>>>>      select DP8393X
>>>>>>>>      select OR_IRQ
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +config M68K_VIRT
>>>>>>>> +    bool
>>>>>>>> +    select M68K_IRQC
>>>>>>>> +    select VIRT_CTRL
>>>>>>>> +    select GOLDFISH_PIC
>>>>>>>> +    select GOLDFISH_TTY
>>>>>>>> +    select GOLDFISH_RTC
>>>>>>>> +    select VIRTIO_MMIO
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I had this error on gitlab:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (qemu) QEMU_PROG: -drive driver=IMGFMT,file=TEST_DIR/t.IMGFMT,if=virtio:
>>>>>>> 'virtio-blk-pci' is not a valid device model name
>>>>>>> job: check-system-fedora
>>>>>>> https://gitlab.com/philmd/qemu/-/jobs/1106469724
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I bisected locally to this commit.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> check-system-fedora uses build-system-fedora:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> build-system-fedora:
>>>>>>>     CONFIGURE_ARGS: --disable-gcrypt --enable-nettle --enable-docs
>>>>>>>              --enable-fdt=system --enable-slirp=system
>>>>>>>              --enable-capstone=system
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm confused because the machine provides a VIRTIO bus
>>>>>>> via MMIO:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> config VIRTIO_MMIO
>>>>>>>     bool
>>>>>>>     select VIRTIO
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I remember I tested your machine with virtio-blk-device.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> config VIRTIO_BLK
>>>>>>>     bool
>>>>>>>     default y
>>>>>>>     depends on VIRTIO
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ah, this is virtio-blk-pci, which has:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> virtio_pci_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_VIRTIO_BLK', if_true:
>>>>>>> files('virtio-blk-pci.c'))
>>>>>>> virtio_ss.add_all(when: 'CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI', if_true: virtio_pci_ss)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And VIRTIO_PCI isn't selected...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This machine doesn't have virtio-pci, but only virtio-mmio buses.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. I meant "VIRTIO_PCI isn't selected, which is the correct config
>>>>> for this machine". So the problem isn't the m68k-virt machine addition,
>>>>> but it shows another problem elsewhere.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are the tests incorrect then?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> libqos isn't restricted to PCI:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> tests/qtest/libqos/virtio-blk.c:24:#include "virtio-blk.h"
>>>>>>> tests/qtest/libqos/virtio-blk.c:29:/* virtio-blk-device */
>>>>>>> tests/qtest/libqos/virtio-blk.c:33:    if (!g_strcmp0(interface,
>>>>>>> "virtio-blk")) {
>>>>>>> tests/qtest/libqos/virtio-blk.c:40:    fprintf(stderr, "%s not present
>>>>>>> in virtio-blk-device\n", interface);
>>>>>>> tests/qtest/libqos/virtio-blk.c:109:    /* virtio-blk-device */
>>>>>>> tests/qtest/libqos/virtio-blk.c:111:
>>>>>>> qos_node_create_driver("virtio-blk-device", virtio_blk_device_create);
>>>>>>> tests/qtest/libqos/virtio-blk.c:112:
>>>>>>> qos_node_consumes("virtio-blk-device", "virtio-bus", &opts);
>>>>>>> tests/qtest/libqos/virtio-blk.c:113:
>>>>>>> qos_node_produces("virtio-blk-device", "virtio-blk");
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But qemu-iotests / qtests do use virtio-blk-pci. Maybe they should
>>>>>>> use a generic virtio-blk-device instead, hoping it get plugged correctly
>>>>>>> to the virtio bus...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, it's how the machine work: it has 128 virtio-mmio buses and 
>>>>>> virtio-devices are plugged directly
>>>>>> in the first free ones.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the fix would be to disable the virtio-blk-pci test for the 
>>>>>> machines without PCI bus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why is it executed for now?
>>>>>
>>>>> This is probably the problem root cause.
>>>>>
>>>>> Possible fix:
>>>>>
>>>>> -->8 --
>>>>> diff --git a/tests/qtest/meson.build b/tests/qtest/meson.build
>>>>> index 66ee9fbf450..d7f3fad51c1 100644
>>>>> --- a/tests/qtest/meson.build
>>>>> +++ b/tests/qtest/meson.build
>>>>> @@ -217,13 +217,17 @@
>>>>>    'emc141x-test.c',
>>>>>    'usb-hcd-ohci-test.c',
>>>>>    'virtio-test.c',
>>>>> -  'virtio-blk-test.c',
>>>>> -  'virtio-net-test.c',
>>>>> -  'virtio-rng-test.c',
>>>>> -  'virtio-scsi-test.c',
>>>>>    'virtio-serial-test.c',
>>>>>    'vmxnet3-test.c',
>>>>>  )
>>>>> +if config_all_devices.has_key('CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI')
>>>>> +  qos_test_ss.add(
>>>>> +    'virtio-blk-test.c',
>>>>> +    'virtio-net-test.c',
>>>>> +    'virtio-rng-test.c',
>>>>> +    'virtio-scsi-test.c',
>>>>> +  )
>>>>> +endif
>>>>>  if have_virtfs
>>>>>    qos_test_ss.add(files('virtio-9p-test.c'))
>>>>>  endif
>>>>> ---
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll test that locally but not on Gitlab.
>>>
>>> This approach doesn't work for the iotests.
>>>
>>>> This also removes the virtio-devices test, I think we should keep the 
>>>> files, but in the files to
>>>> disable the PCI part when it is not available.
>>> I don't understand how the virtio devices are created, it seems there
>>> is an alias to generic virtio hw that map to the arch virtio bus.
>>>
>>> I was not obvious to understand why start the virt machine with
>>> "-device virtio-blk" returns "'virtio-blk-pci' is not a valid device
>>> model name" at first, then I figured out the qdev_alias_table array.
>>>
>>> Maybe you need to complete it for your arch? I've been using that:
>>>
>>> -- >8 --
>>> diff --git a/softmmu/qdev-monitor.c b/softmmu/qdev-monitor.c
>>> index 8dc656becca..b326bd76c2a 100644
>>> --- a/softmmu/qdev-monitor.c
>>> +++ b/softmmu/qdev-monitor.c
>>> @@ -65,8 +65,10 @@ static const QDevAlias qdev_alias_table[] = {
>>>      { "virtio-balloon-ccw", "virtio-balloon", QEMU_ARCH_S390X },
>>>      { "virtio-balloon-pci", "virtio-balloon",
>>>              QEMU_ARCH_ALL & ~QEMU_ARCH_S390X },
>>> +    { "virtio-blk-device", "virtio-blk", QEMU_ARCH_M68K },
>>>      { "virtio-blk-ccw", "virtio-blk", QEMU_ARCH_S390X },
>>> -    { "virtio-blk-pci", "virtio-blk", QEMU_ARCH_ALL & ~QEMU_ARCH_S390X },
>>> +    { "virtio-blk-pci", "virtio-blk", QEMU_ARCH_ALL
>>> +                                      & ~(QEMU_ARCH_S390X |
>>> QEMU_ARCH_M68K) },
>>>      { "virtio-gpu-ccw", "virtio-gpu", QEMU_ARCH_S390X },
>>>      { "virtio-gpu-pci", "virtio-gpu", QEMU_ARCH_ALL & ~QEMU_ARCH_S390X },
>>>      { "virtio-input-host-ccw", "virtio-input-host", QEMU_ARCH_S390X },
>>> @@ -84,8 +86,10 @@ static const QDevAlias qdev_alias_table[] = {
>>>      { "virtio-rng-pci", "virtio-rng", QEMU_ARCH_ALL & ~QEMU_ARCH_S390X },
>>>      { "virtio-scsi-ccw", "virtio-scsi", QEMU_ARCH_S390X },
>>>      { "virtio-scsi-pci", "virtio-scsi", QEMU_ARCH_ALL & ~QEMU_ARCH_S390X },
>>> +    { "virtio-serial-device", "virtio-serial", QEMU_ARCH_M68K },
>>>      { "virtio-serial-ccw", "virtio-serial", QEMU_ARCH_S390X },
>>> -    { "virtio-serial-pci", "virtio-serial", QEMU_ARCH_ALL &
>>> ~QEMU_ARCH_S390X },
>>> +    { "virtio-serial-pci", "virtio-serial", QEMU_ARCH_ALL
>>> +                                            & ~(QEMU_ARCH_S390X |
>>> QEMU_ARCH_M68K)},
>>>      { "virtio-tablet-ccw", "virtio-tablet", QEMU_ARCH_S390X },
>>>      { "virtio-tablet-pci", "virtio-tablet", QEMU_ARCH_ALL &
>>> ~QEMU_ARCH_S390X },
>>>      { }
>>> ---
>>>
>>> But this looks ugly, I don't think it should work that way (because
>>> a machine could provide virtio buses over multiple transport, mmio
>>> and pci...).
>>
>> IMHO, this looks like the solution.
>>
>> The alias is to define the prefered way, on PCI it's the -pci one otherwise 
>> it is the -device one.
> 
> See:
> 
> commit 5f629d943cb0b11c37a891cf4f40a9166aee6f53
> Author: Alexander Graf <ag...@csgraf.de>
> Date:   Fri May 18 02:36:26 2012 +0200
> 
>     s390x: fix s390 virtio aliases
> 
>     Some of the virtio devices have the same frontend name, but actually
>     implement different devices behind the scenes through aliases.
> 
>     The indicator which device type to use is the architecture. On s390, we
>     want s390 virtio devices. On everything else, we want PCI devices.
> 
>     Reflect this in the alias selection code. This way we fix commands like
>     -device virtio-blk on s390x which with this patch applied select the
>     correct virtio-blk-s390 device rather than virtio-blk-pci.
> 
>     Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>

So now than MMIO is available, we hit the "everything else" limit :)

The other function I had to modify is in tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py:

  def get_virtio_scsi_device():
      if qemu_default_machine == 's390-ccw-virtio':
          return 'virtio-scsi-ccw'
      return 'virtio-scsi-pci'

But Max said there is no interest in testing the block devices here
(here = archs providing virtio via MMIO such ARM/m68k).


Reply via email to