On 3/26/21 1:36 PM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
+int fp_exception_el(CPUARMState *env, int cur_el)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
Oh, I'm pretty sure this should be identical with sve_exception_el, where the fpu may or may not be enabled for a given cpu state (e.g. lazy fpu switching in the kvm guest kernel).
Are we really returning constant 0 for kvm before your patch set? r~
