Hi Zenghui, On 4/2/21 12:04 PM, Zenghui Yu wrote: > In emulation of the CFGI_STE_RANGE command, we now take StreamID as the > start of the invalidation range, regardless of whatever the Range is, > whilst the spec clearly states that > > - "Invalidation is performed for an *aligned* range of 2^(Range+1) > StreamIDs." > > - "The bottom Range+1 bits of the StreamID parameter are IGNORED, > aligning the range to its size." > > Take CFGI_ALL (where Range == 31) as an example, if there are some random > bits in the StreamID field, we'll fail to perform the full invalidation but > get a strange range (e.g., SMMUSIDRange={.start=1, .end=0}) instead. Rework > the emulation a bit to get rid of the discrepancy with the spec. > > Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzeng...@huawei.com> Acked-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
Thanks! Eric > --- > hw/arm/smmuv3.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c > index 3b87324ce2..8705612535 100644 > --- a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c > +++ b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c > @@ -980,16 +980,20 @@ static int smmuv3_cmdq_consume(SMMUv3State *s) > } > case SMMU_CMD_CFGI_STE_RANGE: /* same as SMMU_CMD_CFGI_ALL */ > { > - uint32_t start = CMD_SID(&cmd); > + uint32_t sid = CMD_SID(&cmd), mask; > uint8_t range = CMD_STE_RANGE(&cmd); > - uint64_t end = start + (1ULL << (range + 1)) - 1; > - SMMUSIDRange sid_range = {start, end}; > + SMMUSIDRange sid_range; > > if (CMD_SSEC(&cmd)) { > cmd_error = SMMU_CERROR_ILL; > break; > } > - trace_smmuv3_cmdq_cfgi_ste_range(start, end); > + > + mask = (1ULL << (range + 1)) - 1; > + sid_range.start = sid & ~mask; > + sid_range.end = sid_range.start + mask; > + > + trace_smmuv3_cmdq_cfgi_ste_range(sid_range.start, sid_range.end); > g_hash_table_foreach_remove(bs->configs, smmuv3_invalidate_ste, > &sid_range); > break; >