On 4/28/21 11:32 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 28/04/2021 11.24, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 02:52:56PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> @@ -158,7 +166,11 @@ static void pci_piix_ide_realize(PCIDevice *dev,
>>> Error **errp)
>>> vmstate_register(VMSTATE_IF(dev), 0, &vmstate_ide_pci, d);
>>> - pci_piix_init_ports(d);
>>> + rc = pci_piix_init_ports(d);
>>> + if (rc) {
>>> + error_setg_errno(errp, -rc, "Failed to realize %s",
>>> + object_get_typename(OBJECT(dev)));
>>> + }
>>
>> Is there an error message explaining the reason for the failure
>> somewhere. I can't see one in the patch and imagine users will be
>> puzzled/frustrated by a generic "Failed to realize" error message. Can
>> you make it more meaningful?
>
> Do you have a suggestion for a better message?
At this point it is hard to do better... Else we'd need to propagate
a meaningful Error* from ide_init_ioport(), and emit something like
"Failed to initialize the ISA bus"?
