On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 19:02, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 4/28/21 6:34 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > > I think the test should have been > > > > if (have_system or have_tools) and > > Yes but virtiofsd is not a tool... It is a standalone binary.
This is not a distinction that our build/configure system currently makes. We have three categories: * user-mode emulator binaries * system-mode emulator binaries * tools where essentially a "tool" is "any binary we build that isn't a QEMU binary proper". If virtiofsd is genuinely not related to QEMU at all, what is it doing in our source tree ? thanks -- PMM
