On 5/1/21 6:46 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Le 24/04/2021 à 01:36, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
>> TYPE_ETRAX_FS_TIMER is a sysbus device, so its DeviceClass::reset()
>> handler is called automatically when its qbus parent is reset.
>> Convert the generic reset to a qdev one, and remove the
>> qemu_register_reset() call.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
>> ---
>>  hw/timer/etraxfs_timer.c | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/timer/etraxfs_timer.c b/hw/timer/etraxfs_timer.c
>> index 5379006086f..3cfab3e3284 100644
>> --- a/hw/timer/etraxfs_timer.c
>> +++ b/hw/timer/etraxfs_timer.c
>> @@ -309,9 +309,9 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps timer_ops = {
>>      }
>>  };
>>  
>> -static void etraxfs_timer_reset(void *opaque)
>> +static void etraxfs_timer_reset(DeviceState *dev)
>>  {
>> -    ETRAXTimerState *t = opaque;
>> +    ETRAXTimerState *t = ETRAX_TIMER(dev);
>>  
>>      ptimer_transaction_begin(t->ptimer_t0);
>>      ptimer_stop(t->ptimer_t0);
>> @@ -343,7 +343,6 @@ static void etraxfs_timer_realize(DeviceState *dev, 
>> Error **errp)
>>      memory_region_init_io(&t->mmio, OBJECT(t), &timer_ops, t,
>>                            "etraxfs-timer", 0x5c);
>>      sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &t->mmio);
>> -    qemu_register_reset(etraxfs_timer_reset, t);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static void etraxfs_timer_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>> @@ -351,6 +350,7 @@ static void etraxfs_timer_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, 
>> void *data)
>>      DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>>  
>>      dc->realize = etraxfs_timer_realize;
>> +    dc->reset = etraxfs_timer_reset;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static const TypeInfo etraxfs_timer_info = {
>>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu>
> 
> But according to the comment in DeviceClass, we should use the resettable 
> interface now:
> 
> docs/devel/reset.rst

Eh... As a first step, I think we gain in removing the
qemu_register_reset() call.

It seems overkill to use the 3-state reset interface,
but if it is deprecated, then OK.

Thanks for reviewing,

Phil.

Reply via email to