On 2011-09-29 20:05, Amit Shah wrote: > On (Thu) 29 Sep 2011 [19:53:47], Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> Can't reproduce, I'm not getting stable hibernation here even without >>>> any network configured. >>> >>> With virtio devices and the patches applied? Can you tell me what >>> you're seeing? >> >> No, I didn't patch my guest. I was using standard IDE with an emulated >> NIC (or without) against a 3.1-rc3 (or so) guest. > > Strange, using qemu.git and an F14 guest (2.6.38) using this cmd line: > > ./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512 /guests/f14-suspend.qcow2 -net > none -enable-kvm -smp 2 > > I could successfully hibernate and resume.
-cpu qemu64,-kvmclock makes it work. Would have to check a different kernel version to find out if it's a guest kernel or qemu/kvm issue. > >>>> Could you check if the recent pull request [1] changes the picture for you? >>> >>> Thanks, that series fixes the problem. >> >> Perfect! Right in time. :) > > And people say slirp is neglected and unmaintainable :-) Who says this? I think slirp just needed some attention. It already presented two fairly old bugs to me, but strangely right after I adopted it... ;) Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux