Nathan Ringo <nat...@remexre.xyz> writes:
> I'm mostly looking at AArch64, so they're the same there :) I'm using > this to collect code coverage information, so I have the disassembly, > and it's slightly easier to report it that way; Have you considered collecting this information with TCG plugins? That way you can instrument what was actually instrumented directly. > if you think it'd be > more useful on other architectures to report the byte range instead, > it'd be an easy change to my scripts. > > Also, noticed I accidentally deleted the first line of the commit > message when I updated the patch... I can fix that if you want me to > switch the size metric. -- Alex Bennée
