* Kevin Wolf (kw...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Commit f61fe11aa6f broke hmp_loadvm() by adding an incorrect negation
> when converting from 0/-errno return values to a bool value. The result
> is that loadvm resumes the VM now if it failed and keeps it stopped if
> it failed. Fix it to restore the old behaviour and do it the other way
> around.
I think your wording is wrong there - you have two 'if it failed'
> Fixes: f61fe11aa6f7f8f0ffe4ddaa56a8108f3ab57854
> Cc: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org
> Reported-by: Yanhui Ma <y...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
> ---
> monitor/hmp-cmds.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/monitor/hmp-cmds.c b/monitor/hmp-cmds.c
> index 0ad5b77477..cc15d9b6ee 100644
> --- a/monitor/hmp-cmds.c
> +++ b/monitor/hmp-cmds.c
> @@ -1133,7 +1133,7 @@ void hmp_loadvm(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
>
> vm_stop(RUN_STATE_RESTORE_VM);
>
> - if (!load_snapshot(name, NULL, false, NULL, &err) && saved_vm_running) {
> + if (load_snapshot(name, NULL, false, NULL, &err) && saved_vm_running) {
> vm_start();
So if I'm reading htat right, that gets you it restarting it if
load_snapshot returns true, and it returns true if the load_snapshot
worked; i.e. if we were running and we succesfully load a snasphot
then we carry on running.
Other than the commit message, it makes sense tome:
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> }
> hmp_handle_error(mon, err);
> --
> 2.30.2
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
