On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 22:18, Richard Henderson
<richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
> --- a/target/arm/sve_helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/sve_helper.c
> @@ -1487,9 +1487,49 @@ DO_CMLA(sve2_sqrdcmlah_zzzz_h, int16_t, H2, 
> DO_SQRDMLAH_H)
>  DO_CMLA(sve2_sqrdcmlah_zzzz_s, int32_t, H4, DO_SQRDMLAH_S)
>  DO_CMLA(sve2_sqrdcmlah_zzzz_d, int64_t,   , DO_SQRDMLAH_D)
>
> +#undef DO_SQRDMLAH_B
> +#undef DO_SQRDMLAH_H
> +#undef DO_SQRDMLAH_S
> +#undef DO_SQRDMLAH_D
>  #undef do_cmla
>  #undef DO_CMLA

Maybe these undefs should go in an earlier patch? Or perhaps
we just shouldn't use the same DO_foo name for two different
operations...

Otherwise
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to