On 5/13/21 2:25 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
-VDOT_scalar 1111 1110 0 . 10 .... .... 1101 . q:1 index:1 u:1 rm:4 \
- vm=%vm_dp vn=%vn_dp vd=%vd_dp
+VDOT_scalar 1111 1110 0 . 10 .... .... 1101 . q:1 index:1 u:1 vm:4 \
+ vn=%vn_dp vd=%vd_dp
Is it possible to make this kind of bug a decodetree error?
It seems unlikely that there's a use for having a bit which is
decoded both by a %foo field specification and also in some
other way...
That's not what's happening here. This has separate fields "rm" and "vm"
decoded in different ways.
r~
