On Wed, 19 May 2021 06:57:36 +0200
Ilya Leoshkevich <i...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> This series for the s390-next tree fixes [1]. Patch 1 is the fix, patch
> 2 is the new test to avoid similar regressions in the future.
> 
> [1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-05/msg02962.html
> 
> v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-05/msg03219.html
> v1 -> v2: Fixed a problem with compiling the new test on centos7. `make
>           docker-all-tests` does not spot any other issues with the
>           updated patch (it does fail though: a number of iotests have
>           problems, there is a build problem with musl, etc, but this
>           all happens without the patch too).
> 
> Ilya Leoshkevich (2):
>   target/i386: Make sure that vsyscall's tb->size != 0
>   tests/tcg/x86_64: add vsyscall smoke test
> 
>  target/i386/tcg/translate.c      |  1 +
>  tests/tcg/x86_64/Makefile.target |  6 +++++-
>  tests/tcg/x86_64/vsyscall.c      | 12 ++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 tests/tcg/x86_64/vsyscall.c
> 

Passes my tests and CI now.

Can I get an ack on patch 2? :)


Reply via email to