On Thu, 27 May 2021 at 11:37, Hamza Mahfooz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 27 2021 at 11:16:56 AM +0100, Peter Maydell > <[email protected]> wrote: > > If we do want to change from sigprocmask() to pthread_sigmask(), we > > should be consistent about doing that, not just change this call > > only.) > On that note, do you think it would worthwhile to have a Coccinelle > script replace all instances of sigprocmask with pthread_sigmask (in > linux-user, of course)?
What issue are we trying to fix by making this change ? There are only 7 calls so a coccinelle script seems like overkill. thanks -- PMM
