* Connor Kuehl (cku...@redhat.com) wrote: > It may not be appropriate for me to take over as a maintainer at this time, > but I would consider myself familiar with AMD SEV and what this code is > meant to be doing as part of a VMM for launching SEV-protected guests. > > To that end, I would be happy to volunteer as a reviewer for SEV-related > changes so that I am CC'd on them and can help share the review burden with > whoever does maintain this code. > > Signed-off-by: Connor Kuehl <cku...@redhat.com>
Ooh yes please, we could do with someone to be a reviewer; > --- > Note: because there's no maintainer entry, when running > ./scripts/get_maintainers.pl on target/i386/sev.c, my name and the qemu > mailing list is the only thing that shows up... it doesn't even show > previous committers (as it would before applying this patch). Which is > probably not great considering I do not make pull requests to QEMU. > > Is the way forward to get someone to sign up as a maintainer before > applying a patch like this? If you wanted to do a submaintainer for it and send it to one of the x86 maintainers rather than having to do full pulls? Dave > MAINTAINERS | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index 7d9cd29042..3eb7ce8fc6 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -2938,6 +2938,10 @@ F: hw/core/clock-vmstate.c > F: hw/core/qdev-clock.c > F: docs/devel/clocks.rst > > +AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization > +R: Connor Kuehl <cku...@redhat.com> > +F: target/i386/sev.c > + > Usermode Emulation > ------------------ > Overall usermode emulation > -- > 2.31.1 > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
