Meson is more verbose than the configure script; the outcome of the preadv test
can be found in its output and it is not worth including it again in the 
summary.

Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
---
 meson.build | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meson.build b/meson.build
index 87147a5f3f..3809f51f7f 100644
--- a/meson.build
+++ b/meson.build
@@ -2565,7 +2565,6 @@ summary_info += {'PIE':               get_option('b_pie')}
 summary_info += {'static build':      config_host.has_key('CONFIG_STATIC')}
 summary_info += {'malloc trim support': has_malloc_trim}
 summary_info += {'membarrier':        config_host.has_key('CONFIG_MEMBARRIER')}
-summary_info += {'preadv support':    config_host_data.get('CONFIG_PREADV')}
 summary_info += {'fdatasync':         config_host.has_key('CONFIG_FDATASYNC')}
 summary_info += {'madvise':           config_host.has_key('CONFIG_MADVISE')}
 summary_info += {'posix_madvise':     
config_host.has_key('CONFIG_POSIX_MADVISE')}
-- 
2.31.1



Reply via email to