On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 02:16:55PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > &error_abort has been a clear win for us. &error_fatal too, when used > judiciously. Marc-André tried to get both into GLib, unsuccessfully[2].
...snip... > [2] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2288 This doesn't actually suggest adding error_abort/fatal to GLib. Rather it adds a general callback hook to GLib. Biggest complaints there are around the callback concept and difficulty of safely using it, which I can't disagree with. I wonder if we would have more luck if we explicitly proposed the error_abort/fatal concept to GLib instead. At least that would not hit any of the complaints raised about the callback. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
