On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 02:43:06AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:22:01AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 02:07:46PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > > Um.. why? PCI is defined by the spec to be LE, so I don't see that we
> > > need explicit endianness versions for PCI helpers.
> >
> > LE in the spec only applies to structures defined by the spec,
> > that is pci configuration and msix tables in device memory.
>
> Well, true. But when was the last time you saw a PCI device with BE
> registers? I think it's a rare enough case that the individual device
> models can reswap themselves.
s/BE registers/BE DMA accessed structures/
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
