On 29/06/2021 16.19, Cho, Yu-Chen wrote:
replace general "else" with specific checks for each possible accelerator.
Handle qtest as a NOP, and error out for an unknown accelerator used in
combination with tod.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Fontana <cfont...@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <coh...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cho, Yu-Chen <a...@suse.com>
---
hw/s390x/tod.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/tod.c b/hw/s390x/tod.c
index 3c2979175e..fd5a36bf24 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/tod.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/tod.c
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
#include "qemu/error-report.h"
#include "qemu/module.h"
#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
+#include "sysemu/tcg.h"
+#include "sysemu/qtest.h"
#include "migration/qemu-file-types.h"
#include "migration/register.h"
@@ -23,8 +25,13 @@ void s390_init_tod(void)
if (kvm_enabled()) {
obj = object_new(TYPE_KVM_S390_TOD);
- } else {
+ } else if (tcg_enabled()) {
obj = object_new(TYPE_QEMU_S390_TOD);
+ } else if (qtest_enabled()) {
+ return;
+ } else {
+ error_report("current accelerator not handled in s390_init_tod!");
+ abort();
}
object_property_add_child(qdev_get_machine(), TYPE_S390_TOD, obj);
object_unref(obj);
I think it might be better to swap the order of patch 03 and 04, to avoid
that the qtests might break during bisecting later.
For this patch itself:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
