> -----Original Message----- > From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philippe.mathieu.da...@gmail.com> On > Behalf Of Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > Sent: Sunday, July 4, 2021 12:38 PM > To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > Cc: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>; Jiaxun Yang > <jiaxun.y...@flygoat.com>; Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu>; Aleksandar > Rikalo <aleksandar.rik...@syrmia.com>; Taylor Simpson > <tsimp...@quicinc.com>; Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>; > Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net>; Helge Deller <del...@gmx.de> > Subject: [PATCH 12/12] linux-user: Extract target errno related functions to > 'target_errno.h' > > diff --git a/linux-user/target_errno.h b/linux-user/target_errno.h new file > mode 100644 index 00000000000..4e5e9d384c9 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/linux-user/target_errno.h > @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ > + > +void target_to_host_errno_table_init(void);
This is added as static in linux-user/syscall.c in patch 10/12. But then, removed from syscall.c in this patch and added to linux-user/target_errno.c in this patch. Is this so that each patch in the series will build? > diff --git a/linux-user/target_errno.c b/linux-user/target_errno.c new file > mode 100644 index 00000000000..2a7320d240f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/linux-user/target_errno.c > @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@ > +/* > + * Linux syscalls Copy/paste error? Could you add a more descriptive comment to this file for posterity? - How does the default behavior get inherited by targets? - How does a target override the default behavior? - A pointer to a target that is overriding the default behavior? Thanks, Taylor
