On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 at 07:33, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Coverity seems to have issues figuring out the properties of g_malloc0 > and other non *_n functions. While this was "fixed" by removing the > custom second argument to __coverity_mark_as_afm_allocated__, inline > the code from the array-based allocation functions to avoid future > issues. > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> thanks -- PMM
