From: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> > > Right, that's true of any standard implementation of abs(). > > I thought about making it return uint64_t, but that could make it > > weird for other uses of abs64(), where callers wouldn't expect a type > > change from int64_t to uint64_t. Maybe create a separate uabs64() that > > returns uint64_t? Or is that even weirder? :) > > Which users of abs64 would expect it to return int64_t? > kvm_pit_update_clock_offset() doesn't seem to.
Oh, I wasn't referring to any specific users. What I meant is that, if we make abs64() generically available from host-utils, callers could expect it to behave the same way as abs() in stdlib, for example. -- Luis Pires Instituto de Pesquisas ELDORADO Aviso Legal - Disclaimer <https://www.eldorado.org.br/disclaimer.html>
