On Montag, 27. September 2021 12:59:40 CEST Greg Kurz wrote: > On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 12:35:16 +0200 > > Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> wrote: > > On Dienstag, 31. August 2021 14:25:04 CEST Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > > > On Dienstag, 31. August 2021 13:58:02 CEST Greg Kurz wrote: > > > > On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 14:47:26 +0200 > > > > > > > > Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> wrote: > > > > > Patches 1 and 2 introduce include/qemu/qarray.h which implements a > > > > > deep > > > > > auto free mechanism for arrays. See commit log of patch 1 for a > > > > > detailed > > > > > explanation and motivation for introducing QArray. > > > > > > > > > > Patches 3..5 are provided (e.g. as example) for 9p being the first > > > > > user > > > > > of > > > > > this new QArray API. These particular patches 3..5 are rebased on my > > > > > current 9p queue: > > > > > https://github.com/cschoenebeck/qemu/commits/9p.next > > > > > > > > > which are basically just the following two queued patches: > > > > This looks nice indeed but I have the impression the same could be > > > > achieved using glib's g_autoptr framework with less code being added > > > > to QEMU (at the cost of being less generic maybe). > > > > > > I haven't seen a way doing this with glib, except of GArray which has > > > some > > > disadvantages. But who knows, maybe I was missing something. > > > > Ping > > > > Let's do this? > > Hi Christian, > > Sorry I don't have enough bandwidth to review or to look for an alternate > way... :-\ So I suggest you just go forward with this series. Hopefully > you can get some reviews from Markus and/or Richard.
Ok, then I wait for few more days, and if there are no repsonses, nor vetos then I'll queue these patches anyway. Best regards, Christian Schoenebeck
