Hello Eric, On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 4:32 PM Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 04:56:13AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote: > > Implement zerocopy on nocomp_send_write(), by making use of QIOChannel > > zerocopy interface. > > > > Change multifd_send_sync_main() so it can distinguish the last sync from > > the setup and per-iteration ones, so a flush_zerocopy() can be called > > at the last sync in order to make sure all RAM is sent before finishing > > the migration. > > > > Also make it return -1 if flush_zerocopy() fails, in order to cancel > > the migration process, and avoid resuming the guest in the target host > > without receiving all current RAM. > > > > This will work fine on RAM migration because the RAM pages are not usually > > freed, > > and there is no problem on changing the pages content between async_send() > > and > > the actual sending of the buffer, because this change will dirty the page > > and > > cause it to be re-sent on a next iteration anyway. > > > > Given a lot of locked memory may be needed in order to use multid migration > > with zerocopy enabled, make it optional by creating a new parameter > > multifd-zerocopy on qapi, so low-privileged users can still perform multifd > > migrations. > > > > Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leob...@redhat.com> > > --- > > qapi/migration.json | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > > migration/migration.h | 1 + > > migration/multifd.h | 2 +- > > migration/migration.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > migration/multifd.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > migration/ram.c | 20 +++++++++++++------- > > monitor/hmp-cmds.c | 4 ++++ > > 7 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/qapi/migration.json b/qapi/migration.json > > index 88f07baedd..c4890cbb54 100644 > > --- a/qapi/migration.json > > +++ b/qapi/migration.json > > @@ -724,6 +724,11 @@ > > # will consume more CPU. > > # Defaults to 1. (Since 5.0) > > # > > +# @multifd-zerocopy: Controls behavior on sending memory pages on multifd > > migration. > > +# When true, enables a zerocopy mechanism for sending > > memory > > +# pages, if host does support it. > > s/does support/supports/ (several instances this patch)
I will make sure to fix that in v5. > > > +# Defaults to false. (Since 6.2) > > +# > > # @block-bitmap-mapping: Maps block nodes and bitmaps on them to > > # aliases for the purpose of dirty bitmap > > migration. Such > > # aliases may for example be the corresponding > > names on the > > @@ -758,6 +763,7 @@ > > 'xbzrle-cache-size', 'max-postcopy-bandwidth', > > 'max-cpu-throttle', 'multifd-compression', > > 'multifd-zlib-level' ,'multifd-zstd-level', > > + 'multifd-zerocopy', > > 'block-bitmap-mapping' ] } > > Should this feature be guarded with 'if':'CONFIG_LINUX', since that's > the only platform where you even compile the code (even then, it can > still fail if the kernel doesn't support it). I think it makes sense for the feature to always be available, even though it's not supported outside linux > v4.14. IMHO it makes more sense for the user to get an error when it starts migration, due to host not supporting zerocopy, than the error happening in the config step, which may cause the user to question if it was the right parameter. The config message error here could also be ignored, and users can think zerocopy is working, while it's not. For automated migrations, this feature should never be enabled for non-linux / older linux hosts anyway. Is there a good argument I am missing for this feature being disabled on non-linux? > > -- > Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 > Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org > Best regards, Leo
