On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 10:16 PM Eugenio Pérez <epere...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> The -1 assumes that all devices with no cvq have an spare vq allocated
> for them, but with no offer of VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_VQ. This may not be the
> case, and the device may have a pair number of queues.
>
> To fix this, just resort to the lower even number of queues.
>
> Fixes: 049eb15b5fc9 ("vhost: record the last virtqueue index for the virtio
> device")
> Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <epere...@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/net/vhost_net.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/net/vhost_net.c b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> index 0d888f29a6..edf56a597f 100644
> --- a/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> +++ b/hw/net/vhost_net.c
> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ int vhost_net_start(VirtIODevice *dev, NetClientState
> *ncs,
> NetClientState *peer;
>
> if (!cvq) {
> - last_index -= 1;
> + last_index &= ~1ULL;
> }
The math here looks correct but we need to fix vhost_vdpa_dev_start() instead?
if (dev->vq_index + dev->nvqs - 1 != dev->last_index) {
...
}
Thanks
>
> if (!k->set_guest_notifiers) {
> --
> 2.27.0
>
