Hi Dov, Overall the patch looks good, only question I have is that now we are enforce qemu to hash the kernel, initrd and cmdline unconditionally for any of the SEV guest launches. This requires anyone wanting to calculating the expected measurement need to account for it. Should we make the hash page build optional ?
I am thinking this more for the SEV-SNP guest. As you may be aware that with SEV-SNP the attestation is performed by the guest, and its possible for the launch flow to pass 512-bits of host_data that gets included in the report. If a user wants to do the hash'e checks for the SNP then they can pass a hash of kernel, initrd and cmdline through a launch_finish.ID_BLOCK.host_data and does not require a special hash page. This it will simplify the expected hash calculation. Adding a special page requires a validation of that page. All the prevalidated page need to be excluded by guest BIOS page validation flow to avoid the double validation. The hash page is populated only when we pass -kernel and it will be tricky to communicate this information to the guest BIOS so that it can skip the validation. Thoughts ? thanks On 11/1/21 5:21 AM, Dov Murik wrote: > Tom Lendacky and Brijesh Singh reported two issues with launching SEV > guests with the -kernel QEMU option when an old [1] or wrongly configured [2] > OVMF images are used. > > The fixes in patches 1 and 2 allow such guests to boot by skipping the > kernel/initrd/cmdline hashes addition to the initial guest memory (and > warning the user). > > Patch 3 is a refactoring of parts of the same function > sev_add_kernel_loader_hashes() to calculate all padding sizes at > compile-time. This patch is not required to fix the issues above, but > is suggested as an improvement (no functional change intended). > > Note that launch measurement security is not harmed by these fixes: a > Guest Owner that wants to use measured Linux boot with -kernel, must use > (and measure) an OVMF image that designates a proper hashes table area, > and that verifies those hashes when loading the binaries from QEMU via > fw_cfg. > > The old OVMFs which don't publish the hashes table GUID or don't reserve > a valid area for it in MEMFD cannot support these hashes verification in > any case (for measured boot with -kernel). > > > [1] > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/3b9d10d9-5d9c-da52-f18c-cd93c1931...@amd.com/ > [2] > https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/001dd81a-282d-c307-a657-e228480d4...@amd.com/ > > Dov Murik (3): > sev/i386: Allow launching with -kernel if no OVMF hashes table found > sev/i386: Warn if using -kernel with invalid OVMF hashes table area > sev/i386: Perform padding calculations at compile-time > > target/i386/sev.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > > base-commit: af531756d25541a1b3b3d9a14e72e7fedd941a2e