On 11/2/21 7:15 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/2/21 6:42 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 10:01, Richard Henderson
<richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
On 11/1/21 3:35 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 at 19:28, Richard Henderson
<richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:
On 10/26/21 3:12 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Apple's Hypervisor.Framework forwards cache operations as MMIO traps
into user space. For MMIO however, these have no meaning: There is no
cache attached to them.
So let's just treat cache data exits as nops.
This fixes OpenBSD booting as guest.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@csgraf.de>
Reported-by: AJ Barris <awlsomea...@github.com>
Reference: https://github.com/utmapp/UTM/issues/3197
---
target/arm/hvf/hvf.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
Thanks, applied to target-arm.next
...did you see my email saying I think we also need
to test S1PTW ?
That arrived afterward.
Thinking it over later, I wouldn't be opposed to taking this
patch now and adding the S1PTW second -- I think we're
currently going to do the wrong thing for the "page tables
not in RAM case anyway", so you could regard it as a
separate bug fix.
Heh. I was thinking the something similar, after I dequeued the patch. That this fixes a
problem emulating a well-behaved guest, and that the s1ptw hole is "merely" a problem vs
an ill-behaved guest hitting the following assert.
Well, I've sent off the PR without this included, so I guess this should be the first cab
off the rank for the next set.
I'm quite happy to hand the target-arm.next baton back to you. ;-)
Since I need to re-spin the target-arm.next PR anyway, I've re-queued this.
r~
