On 11/18/21 14:59, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 01:54:38PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 18/11/2021 13.29, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> Add a page listing QEMU sponsors. >>> >>> For now, only mention Fosshost which requested to be listed: >>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-06/msg05381.html >> ... >>> +QEMU has sponsors! >>> + >>> +For continuous integration and testing, hardware is provided by: >>> +- [Fosshost](https://fosshost.org/) >> >> Are we finally using the server now? ... the last time I asked, it was just >> idle and we talked about returning it? > > IMHO, whether we're currently using it or not is tangential. > > The sponsor has granted / reserved resources for QEMU, which can have > a direct cost for them, and/or take away from what the can grant other > projects. As such we should be creditting them for giving us this grant, > even if we've not got around to using it. > > If we do decide to give up any particular resources, it is a quick patch > to update this page again. > > My only suggestion would be that we don't explicitly state /what/ we're > using the resource for, just that we've been granted it > > IOW say something more like > > [Fosshost](https://fosshost.org/) has provided QEMU > access to a dedicated physical compute host. > > [Microsoft](https://microsoft.com) has provided QEMU > with credits for use on Azure Cloud.
This sounds good to me. I will respin using your suggested scheme.
