> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Cain > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 9:25 AM > To: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> > Cc: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>; qemu- > de...@nongnu.org; Taylor Simpson <tsimp...@quicinc.com> > Subject: RE: hexagon container update > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> > .. > > Brian Cain <bc...@quicinc.com> writes: > > > ... > > > We had some issues with the previous attempt to update the container. > > > The linux-user "signals" test failed. Richard pointed out that the > > > archive of the C library had what looks like a defect that would cause > > > the test to fail. > > > > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg849635.html > > > > > > I'm following up now with a workaround - the attached patch references > > > a toolchain which avoids the problem and passes the signals test. This > > > toolchain is based on llvm+clang 13.0.1-rc2. BTW, the release page has > > > a signature provided in case anyone wants to verify the download: > > > https://github.com/quic/toolchain_for_hexagon/releases/tag/13.0.1-rc2_ > > > > > > Can we try again with this new container definition? > > > > > > -Brian > > > > > > [2. 0001-Update-Hexagon-toolchain-to-13.0.1-rc2.patch --- text/x-diff; > 0001- > > Update-Hexagon-toolchain-to-13.0.1-rc2.patch]... > > > > Could you send the updated patch against the current master in the usual > > way please? > > Sorry -- I should have instead asked that the patch be reviewed. It was based > on the current master, though. And once it's reviewed I'll send a pull > request, > right?
No, it wasn't based on master. Apologies, please disregard. -Brian