On 15/2/22 14:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 at 13:18, Christian Schoenebeck
<qemu_...@crudebyte.com> wrote:

On Dienstag, 15. Februar 2022 13:06:25 CET Philippe Mathieu-Daudé via wrote:
We globally ignore the 'initializer overrides' warnings in C code
since commit c1556a812a ("configure: Disable (clang)
initializer-overrides warnings"). Unfortunately the ${gcc_flags}
variable is not propagated to Objective-C flags ($OBJCFLAGS).
Instead of reworking the configure script to test all supported
C flags in Objective-C and sanitize them, ignore the warning
locally with the GCC diagnostic #pragma (Clang ignores it).

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
---

The warning is useful in the pure-standard-C world where there
is no such thing as the "range initialization" syntax. In that
case trying to initialize the same array member twice is very
likely a bug. However, if you use range initialization then
the pattern "initialize a range first, then override some specific
members within it" is very common and the warning is incorrect here.
We use and like the range-initialization syntax, and so we disable
the -Winitializer-overrides warnings. The bug here is just that
we are incorrectly failing to apply the warning flags we use
for C code when we compile ObjC files.

Yes, but simply adding nowarn_flags to objc_args isn't enough, we
need to filter the flags similarly to what is done in C to avoid:

[7/373] Compiling Objective-C object libcommon.fa.p/audio_coreaudio.m.o
warning: unknown warning option '-Wold-style-declaration'; did you mean '-Wout-of-line-declaration'? [-Wunknown-warning-option] warning: unknown warning option '-Wimplicit-fallthrough=2'; did you mean '-Wimplicit-fallthrough'? [-Wunknown-warning-option]
2 warnings generated.
[34/373] Compiling Objective-C object libcommon.fa.p/ui_cocoa.m.o
warning: unknown warning option '-Wold-style-declaration'; did you mean '-Wout-of-line-declaration'? [-Wunknown-warning-option] warning: unknown warning option '-Wimplicit-fallthrough=2'; did you mean '-Wimplicit-fallthrough'? [-Wunknown-warning-option]
2 warnings generated.


Reply via email to