On 16/2/22 11:30, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
On Dienstag, 15. Februar 2022 08:01:37 CET Greg Kurz wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:43:51 +0300
Vitaly Chikunov <v...@altlinux.org> wrote:
Why g_new0 and not just g_malloc0? This is smallest code change, which
seems appropriate for a bug fix.
I prefer g_new0() for the exact reasons that are provided in QEMU's
official coding style docs/devel/style.rst:
[...]
I'm fine with the acceptable version as well. The only important thing is
to fix the synth backend.
Cheers,
Hi, is anybody working on a v5 of this patch? If not I will send one this
evening to bring this issue forward, because it is blocking my queue.
If a patch blocks your tree queue, you can simply drop it, ask the
contributor to rework it, and keep merging your tree...
