From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com>

The way to print uint64_t is with PRIx64, not with
a cast to long long.

Message-Id: <20220206093547.1282513-1-...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
---
 tests/qtest/erst-test.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/qtest/erst-test.c b/tests/qtest/erst-test.c
index c6a0ae4013..f94cd8dd8e 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/erst-test.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/erst-test.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static inline uint64_t in_reg64(ERSTState *s, unsigned reg)
     uint64_t res;
 
     res = qpci_io_readq(s->dev, s->reg_bar, reg);
-    g_test_message("*%s -> %016llx", name, (unsigned long long)res);
+    g_test_message("*%s -> %016" PRIx64, name, res);
 
     return res;
 }
-- 
2.27.0


Reply via email to