From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> The way to print uint64_t is with PRIx64, not with a cast to long long.
Message-Id: <20220206093547.1282513-1-...@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> --- tests/qtest/erst-test.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/qtest/erst-test.c b/tests/qtest/erst-test.c index c6a0ae4013..f94cd8dd8e 100644 --- a/tests/qtest/erst-test.c +++ b/tests/qtest/erst-test.c @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static inline uint64_t in_reg64(ERSTState *s, unsigned reg) uint64_t res; res = qpci_io_readq(s->dev, s->reg_bar, reg); - g_test_message("*%s -> %016llx", name, (unsigned long long)res); + g_test_message("*%s -> %016" PRIx64, name, res); return res; } -- 2.27.0