On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 19:30:39 +0100
Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> wrote:

> API doc comments in QEMU are supposed to be in kerneldoc format, so drop
> occurrences of "@c" which is Doxygen format for fixed-width text.
> 
> Link: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/cafeaca89+enom6x19oef53kd2dwkhn5sn21va0d7yepjsa3...@mail.gmail.com/
> Based-on: <e1np9oz-00043l...@lizzy.crudebyte.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com>
> ---

Sorry for not catching these during previous reviews :-\

Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org>

FWIW it seems some more de-doxygenation is needed :

fsdev/p9array.h: * Consider the following user struct @c Foo which shall be 
used as scalar
fsdev/p9array.h: * @code
fsdev/p9array.h: * and assume it has the following function to free memory 
allocated by @c Foo
fsdev/p9array.h: * @code
fsdev/p9array.h: * @code
fsdev/p9array.h: * @code
fsdev/p9array.h: * @code
hw/9pfs/9p.h:     * Lenght of the affix, that is how many (of the lowest) bits 
of @c value
             extra nit  ^^
hw/9pfs/codir.c: * @note You must @b ALWAYS call @c v9fs_free_dirents(entries) 
after calling

Detected with basic git grepping. Probably not exhaustive.


>  hw/9pfs/9p-util.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h b/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
> index 8b92614e6c..22835c5f61 100644
> --- a/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
> +++ b/hw/9pfs/9p-util.h
> @@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ static inline off_t qemu_dirent_off(struct dirent *dent)
>   * Duplicate directory entry @dent.
>   *
>   * It is highly recommended to use this function instead of open coding
> - * duplication of @c dirent objects, because the actual @c struct @c dirent
> - * size may be bigger or shorter than @c sizeof(struct dirent) and correct
> + * duplication of dirent objects, because the actual struct dirent
> + * size may be bigger or shorter than sizeof(struct dirent) and correct
>   * handling is platform specific (see gitlab issue #841).
>   *
>   * @dent - original directory entry to be duplicated


Reply via email to