The pvr_match for a CPU class is not supposed to just match for any
CPU in the family, but rather whether this particular CPU class is the
best match in the family.

Prior to this fix, e.g., a POWER9 DD2.3 KVM host matches to the
power9_v1.0 class (because that's first in the list). After the patch,
it matches the power9_v2.0 class.

Fixes: 03ae4133ab8 ("target-ppc: Add pvr_match() callback")
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>
---
 target/ppc/cpu_init.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu_init.c b/target/ppc/cpu_init.c
index 073fd10168..83ca741bea 100644
--- a/target/ppc/cpu_init.c
+++ b/target/ppc/cpu_init.c
@@ -5910,13 +5910,14 @@ static void init_proc_POWER7(CPUPPCState *env)
 
 static bool ppc_pvr_match_power7(PowerPCCPUClass *pcc, uint32_t pvr)
 {
-    if ((pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK) == CPU_POWERPC_POWER7P_BASE) {
-        return true;
-    }
-    if ((pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK) == CPU_POWERPC_POWER7_BASE) {
-        return true;
+    uint32_t base = pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK;
+    uint32_t pcc_base = pcc->pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK;
+
+    if (base != pcc_base) {
+        return false;
     }
-    return false;
+
+    return true;
 }
 
 static bool cpu_has_work_POWER7(CPUState *cs)
@@ -6070,16 +6071,14 @@ static void init_proc_POWER8(CPUPPCState *env)
 
 static bool ppc_pvr_match_power8(PowerPCCPUClass *pcc, uint32_t pvr)
 {
-    if ((pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK) == CPU_POWERPC_POWER8NVL_BASE) {
-        return true;
-    }
-    if ((pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK) == CPU_POWERPC_POWER8E_BASE) {
-        return true;
-    }
-    if ((pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK) == CPU_POWERPC_POWER8_BASE) {
-        return true;
+    uint32_t base = pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK;
+    uint32_t pcc_base = pcc->pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK;
+
+    if (base != pcc_base) {
+        return false;
     }
-    return false;
+
+    return true;
 }
 
 static bool cpu_has_work_POWER8(CPUState *cs)
@@ -6277,9 +6276,18 @@ static void init_proc_POWER9(CPUPPCState *env)
 
 static bool ppc_pvr_match_power9(PowerPCCPUClass *pcc, uint32_t pvr)
 {
-    if ((pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK) == CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_BASE) {
+    uint32_t base = pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK;
+    uint32_t pcc_base = pcc->pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK;
+
+    if (base != pcc_base) {
+        return false;
+    }
+
+    if ((pvr & 0x0f00) == (pcc->pvr & 0x0f00)) {
+        /* Major DD version matches to power9_v1.0 and power9_v2.0 */
         return true;
     }
+
     return false;
 }
 
@@ -6489,9 +6497,18 @@ static void init_proc_POWER10(CPUPPCState *env)
 
 static bool ppc_pvr_match_power10(PowerPCCPUClass *pcc, uint32_t pvr)
 {
-    if ((pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK) == CPU_POWERPC_POWER10_BASE) {
+    uint32_t base = pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK;
+    uint32_t pcc_base = pcc->pvr & CPU_POWERPC_POWER_SERVER_MASK;
+
+    if (base != pcc_base) {
+        return false;
+    }
+
+    if ((pvr & 0x0f00) == (pcc->pvr & 0x0f00)) {
+        /* Major DD version matches to power10_v1.0 and power10_v2.0 */
         return true;
     }
+
     return false;
 }
 
-- 
2.23.0


Reply via email to