Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes:
> The BootLinux tests are currently failing with an ugly python > stack trace on my RHEL8 system since they cannot get a free port > (likely due to the firewall settings on my system). Let's properly > check the return value of find_free_port() instead and cancel the > test gracefully if it cannot get a free port. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> > --- > Unfortunately, it still takes > 70 seconds for each and every > tests from tests/avocado/boot_linux.py to get canceled, so > tests/avocado/boot_linux.py still renders "make check-avocado" > for me pretty unusable... looking at the implementation of > find_free_port() in Avocado, I wonder whether there isn't a > better way to get a free port number in Python? Brute-forcing > all ports between 1024 and 65536 seems just quite cumbersome > to me... > > tests/avocado/avocado_qemu/__init__.py | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > LGTM, despite the root issue is being addressed in Avocado. Reviewed-by: Cleber Rosa <cr...@redhat.com>
