On 3/28/22 14:14, matheus.fe...@eldorado.org.br wrote:
+        p->frac_hi = shl_double(hi, lo, shift);
+        if (N > 64) {
+            p->frac_lo = shl_double(lo, 0, shift);
+        }

shl_double(x, 0, n) -> x << n.

You could also assign to frac_lo before frac_hi and drop the N > 64 test, though I'm not sure if that reads better or not.

Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>


r~

Reply via email to