Coverity warns about use of uninitialized data in what seems to be a common pattern of use of visit_type_uint32() and similar functions. Here's an example from target/arm/cpu64.c:
static void cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name, void *opaque, Error **errp) { ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj); uint32_t max_vq; if (!visit_type_uint32(v, name, &max_vq, errp)) { return; } [code that does something with max_vq here] } This doesn't initialize max_vq, on the apparent assumption that visit_type_uint32() will do so. But that function is: bool visit_type_uint32(Visitor *v, const char *name, uint32_t *obj, Error **errp) { uint64_t value; bool ok; trace_visit_type_uint32(v, name, obj); value = *obj; ok = visit_type_uintN(v, &value, name, UINT32_MAX, "uint32_t", errp); *obj = value; return ok; } So it reads the value of *obj (the uninitialized max_vq). What's the right way to write this kind of object-property setter function? Just pre-initialize the variable to 0? thanks -- PMM