In exynos4210_init_board_irqs(), the loop that handles IRQ lines that
are in a range that applies to the internal combiner only creates a
splitter for those interrupts which go to both the internal combiner
and to the external GIC, but it does nothing at all for the
interrupts which don't go to the external GIC, leaving the
irq_table[] array element empty for those. (This will result in
those interrupts simply being lost, not in a QEMU crash.)
I don't have a reliable datasheet for this SoC, but since we do wire
up one interrupt line in this category (the HDMI I2C device on
interrupt 16,1), this seems like it must be a bug in the existing
QEMU code. Fill in the irq_table[] entries where we're not splitting
the IRQ to both the internal combiner and the external GIC with the
IRQ line of the internal combiner. (That is, these IRQ lines go to
just one device, not multiple.)
This bug didn't have any visible guest effects because the only
implemented device that was affected was the HDMI I2C controller,
and we never connect any I2C devices to that bus.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
---
hw/arm/exynos4210.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/arm/exynos4210.c b/hw/arm/exynos4210.c
index 919821833b5..a4527f819ef 100644
--- a/hw/arm/exynos4210.c
+++ b/hw/arm/exynos4210.c
@@ -310,6 +310,8 @@ static void exynos4210_init_board_irqs(Exynos4210State *s)
qdev_connect_gpio_out(splitter, 0, is->int_combiner_irq[n]);
qdev_connect_gpio_out(splitter, 1,
qdev_get_gpio_in(extgicdev, irq_id - 32));
+ } else {
+ s->irq_table[n] = is->int_combiner_irq[n];
}
}
/*
--
2.25.1
