Am 02.12.2011 08:28, schrieb Mark Wu:
On 12/02/2011 11:34 AM, Li Zhi Hui wrote:
Signed-off-by: Li Zhi Hui<zhihu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
  qemu-nbd.c |    4 +++-
  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/qemu-nbd.c b/qemu-nbd.c
index 291cba2..ab7fa6c 100644
--- a/qemu-nbd.c
+++ b/qemu-nbd.c
@@ -500,8 +500,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
          sharing_fds[0] = tcp_socket_incoming(bindto, port);
      }

-    if (sharing_fds[0] == -1)
+    if (sharing_fds[0] == -1) {
+        g_free(sharing_fds);
          return 1;
+    }

      if (device) {
          int ret;
Zhihui,

Kernel should free all memory used by the process after it exits. So there's no memory leak even without explicit free.

That's correct. Nevertheless fixing this helps to find other more important
memory leaks with static or dynamic code analyzers like cppcheck or valgrind.

Reviewed-by: Stefan Weil <s...@weilnetz.de>



Reply via email to