On 4/16/22 23:02, Tomoaki Kawada wrote:
`cpu_pc` at this point does not necessary point to the current instruction (i.e., the wait instruction being translated), so it's incorrect to calculate the new value of `cpu_pc` based on this. It must be updated with `ctx->base.pc_next`, which contains the correct address of the next instruction.This change fixes the wait instruction skipping the subsequent branch when used in an idle loop like this: 0: wait bra.b 0b brk // should be unreachable Signed-off-by: Tomoaki Kawada <i...@yvt.jp>
Queued to target-rx-next. r~
