> Weiwei Li <liwei...@iscas.ac.cn> 於 2022年4月26日 下午4:47 寫道： > 在 2022/3/17 下午3:26, ~eopxd 写道: >> From: Yueh-Ting (eop) Chen <eop.c...@sifive.com> <mailto:eop.c...@sifive.com> >> >> This is the first commit regarding the mask agnostic behavior. >> Added option 'rvv_ma_all_1s' to enable the behavior, the option >> is default to false. >> >> Signed-off-by: eop Chen <eop.c...@sifive.com> <mailto:eop.c...@sifive.com> >> Reviewed-by: Frank Chang <frank.ch...@sifive.com> >> <mailto:frank.ch...@sifive.com> > Similar to our last discussion, vext_set_elems_1s_fns array can be > simplified to single vext_set_elems_1s, > > since the fourth argement can be used as the start offset. > > Another question, may be not related to this patchset, in section 3.4.3 of > the spec: > > "Mask destination tail elements are always treated as tail-agnostic, > regardless of the setting of vta." > > What does "Mask destination tail elements" mean? > > Regards, > > Weiwei Li >
I have just updated a new version for the tail agnostic patch set, it also includes a bug fix discovered today. Regarding the question, mask / masked-off are for body elements and respects the mask policy, and tail elements respect the tail policy. Regards, eop Chen
