Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes: > On 5/13/22 14:52, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>> +# @StatsResult: >>> +# >>> +# @provider: provider for this set of statistics. >>> +# @qom-path: QOM path of the object for which the statistics are returned >> Since @qom-path is optional, we better document when it's present. In >> the review thread for v1, you explained "Only if the target is vcpus, >> for the current set of targets." More general, and hopefully still >> correct, would be "Present if that object is a QOM object", but the >> phrasing feels rather clumsy. Would appending ", if any" suffice? >> > > Alternatively: > > # @qom-path: Path to the object for which the statistics are returned, > # if the object is exposed in the QOM tree
Sold!
