Lack of MSI-X support is not an issue for interpreted passthrough devices, so let's let these in. This will allow, for example, ISM devices to be passed through -- but only when interpretation is available and being used.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel <pmo...@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjros...@linux.ibm.com> --- hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c index 156051e6e9..816d17af99 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c @@ -881,6 +881,10 @@ static int s390_pci_msix_init(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev) static void s390_pci_msix_free(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev) { + if (pbdev->msix.entries == 0) { + return; + } + memory_region_del_subregion(&pbdev->iommu->mr, &pbdev->msix_notify_mr); object_unparent(OBJECT(&pbdev->msix_notify_mr)); } @@ -1093,7 +1097,7 @@ static void s390_pcihost_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev, DeviceState *dev, pbdev->interp = false; } - if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev)) { + if (s390_pci_msix_init(pbdev) && !pbdev->interp) { error_setg(errp, "MSI-X support is mandatory " "in the S390 architecture"); return; -- 2.27.0