On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 13:55 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 05.12.2011 21:08, schrieb Justin M. Forbes: > > Typically I get a flurry of patches shortly after > > a release (and they have already started for 1.0). I have tried to get > > a .1 release out in a timely manner, and then it seems patches for > > stable become few and far between. In the 0.14 and 0.15 series, not > > even enough to warrant a .2 release. Perhaps this is due to lack fixed > > issues, or lack of effort to submit to stable. > > > 3) Security fixes do not follow this schedule, and will trigger a stable > > release as needed. > > I would've thought that the usb-ccid CVE alone warrants a 0.15.2 of qemu > and qemu-kvm. I am surprised nothing has happened there yet... > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/128064/ >
I suppose that also brings up the question of how long a stable branch should be supported? Perhaps we should do stable through 2 release cycles, so that 0.15 stable would stop when 1.1 is released? Justin
