On 6/2/22 13:16, Frederic Barrat wrote:
On 31/05/2022 23:49, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:The PnvPHB device is going to be the base device for all other powernv PHBs. It consists of a device that has the same user API as the other PHB, namely being a PCIHostBridge and having chip-id and index properties. It also has a 'backend' pointer that will be initialized with the PHB implementation that the device is going to use. The initialization of the PHB backend is done by checking the PHB version via a 'version' attribute that can be set via a global machine property. The 'version' field will be used to make adjustments based on the running version, e.g. PHB3 uses a 'chip' reference while PHB4 uses 'pec'. To init the PnvPHB bus we'll rely on helpers for each version. The version 3 helper is already added (pnv_phb3_bus_init), the PHB4 helper will be added later on. For now let's add the basic logic of the PnvPHB object, which consists mostly of pnv_phb_realize() doing all the work of checking the phb->version set, initializing the proper backend, passing through its attributes to the chosen backend, finalizing the backend realize and adding a root port in the end. Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb...@gmail.com> --- hw/pci-host/meson.build | 3 +- hw/pci-host/pnv_phb.c | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/pci-host/pnv_phb.h | 39 +++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 hw/pci-host/pnv_phb.c create mode 100644 hw/pci-host/pnv_phb.h diff --git a/hw/pci-host/meson.build b/hw/pci-host/meson.build index c07596d0d1..e832babc9d 100644 --- a/hw/pci-host/meson.build +++ b/hw/pci-host/meson.build @@ -35,5 +35,6 @@ specific_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_PCI_POWERNV', if_true: files( 'pnv_phb3_msi.c', 'pnv_phb3_pbcq.c', 'pnv_phb4.c', - 'pnv_phb4_pec.c' + 'pnv_phb4_pec.c', + 'pnv_phb.c', )) diff --git a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb.c b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..fa8472622f --- /dev/null +++ b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb.c @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ +/* + * QEMU PowerPC PowerNV Proxy PHB model + * + * Copyright (c) 2022, IBM Corporation. + * + * This code is licensed under the GPL version 2 or later. See the + * COPYING file in the top-level directory. + */ + +#include "qemu/osdep.h" +#include "qemu/log.h" +#include "qapi/visitor.h" +#include "qapi/error.h" +#include "hw/pci-host/pnv_phb.h" +#include "hw/pci-host/pnv_phb3.h" +#include "hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.h" +#include "hw/ppc/pnv.h" +#include "hw/qdev-properties.h" +#include "qom/object.h" + + +static void pnv_phb_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) +{ + PnvPHB *phb = PNV_PHB(dev); + PCIHostState *pci = PCI_HOST_BRIDGE(dev); + g_autofree char *phb_typename = NULL; + g_autofree char *phb_rootport_typename = NULL; + + if (!phb->version) { + error_setg(errp, "version not specified"); + return; + } + + switch (phb->version) { + case 3: + phb_typename = g_strdup(TYPE_PNV_PHB3); + phb_rootport_typename = g_strdup(TYPE_PNV_PHB3_ROOT_PORT); + break; + case 4: + phb_typename = g_strdup(TYPE_PNV_PHB4); + phb_rootport_typename = g_strdup(TYPE_PNV_PHB4_ROOT_PORT); + break; + case 5: + phb_typename = g_strdup(TYPE_PNV_PHB5); + phb_rootport_typename = g_strdup(TYPE_PNV_PHB5_ROOT_PORT); + break; + default: + g_assert_not_reached(); + } + + phb->backend = object_new(phb_typename); + object_property_add_child(OBJECT(dev), "phb-device", phb->backend); + + /* Passthrough child device properties to the proxy device */ + object_property_set_uint(phb->backend, "index", phb->phb_id, errp); + object_property_set_uint(phb->backend, "chip-id", phb->chip_id, errp); + object_property_set_link(phb->backend, "phb-base", OBJECT(phb), errp); + + if (phb->version == 3) { + object_property_set_link(phb->backend, "chip", + OBJECT(phb->chip), errp); + } else { + object_property_set_link(phb->backend, "pec", OBJECT(phb->pec), errp); + }The patch is fine, but it just highlights that we're doing something wrong. I don't believe there's any reason for the chip/pec/phb relationship to be different between P8 and P9/P10. One day, a brave soul could try to unify the models, it would avoid test like that.
Not a bad idea, especially if we can cut more complexity out of the code. I'll give it some thought. Daniel
It would be a good cleanup series to do if we ever extend the model with yet another version :-)+ + if (!qdev_realize(DEVICE(phb->backend), NULL, errp)) { + return; + } + + if (phb->version == 3) { + pnv_phb3_bus_init(dev, (PnvPHB3 *)phb->backend); + } + + pnv_phb_attach_root_port(pci, phb_rootport_typename);After we've removed the other instances (done in later patches), we could move pnv_phb_attach_root_port() to pnv_phb.c instead of pnv.c. It would be the perfect home for it as it starts looking off in pnv.c Fred+} + +static const char *pnv_phb_root_bus_path(PCIHostState *host_bridge, + PCIBus *rootbus) +{ + PnvPHB *phb = PNV_PHB(host_bridge); + + snprintf(phb->bus_path, sizeof(phb->bus_path), "00%02x:%02x", + phb->chip_id, phb->phb_id); + return phb->bus_path; +} + +static Property pnv_phb_properties[] = { + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("index", PnvPHB, phb_id, 0), + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("chip-id", PnvPHB, chip_id, 0), + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("version", PnvPHB, version, 0), + + DEFINE_PROP_LINK("chip", PnvPHB, chip, TYPE_PNV_CHIP, PnvChip *), + + DEFINE_PROP_LINK("pec", PnvPHB, pec, TYPE_PNV_PHB4_PEC, + PnvPhb4PecState *), + + DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(), +}; + +static void pnv_phb_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data) +{ + PCIHostBridgeClass *hc = PCI_HOST_BRIDGE_CLASS(klass); + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass); + + hc->root_bus_path = pnv_phb_root_bus_path; + dc->realize = pnv_phb_realize; + device_class_set_props(dc, pnv_phb_properties); + set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_BRIDGE, dc->categories); + dc->user_creatable = true; +} + +static void pnv_phb_register_type(void) +{ + static const TypeInfo pnv_phb_type_info = { + .name = TYPE_PNV_PHB, + .parent = TYPE_PCIE_HOST_BRIDGE, + .instance_size = sizeof(PnvPHB), + .class_init = pnv_phb_class_init, + }; + + type_register_static(&pnv_phb_type_info); +} +type_init(pnv_phb_register_type) diff --git a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb.h b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..a7cc8610e2 --- /dev/null +++ b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb.h @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +/* + * QEMU PowerPC PowerNV Proxy PHB model + * + * Copyright (c) 2022, IBM Corporation. + * + * This code is licensed under the GPL version 2 or later. See the + * COPYING file in the top-level directory. + */ + +#ifndef PCI_HOST_PNV_PHB_H +#define PCI_HOST_PNV_PHB_H + +#include "hw/pci/pcie_host.h" +#include "hw/pci/pcie_port.h" +#include "qom/object.h" + +typedef struct PnvChip PnvChip; +typedef struct PnvPhb4PecState PnvPhb4PecState; + +struct PnvPHB { + PCIExpressHost parent_obj; + + uint32_t chip_id; + uint32_t phb_id; + uint32_t version; + char bus_path[8]; + + PnvChip *chip; + + PnvPhb4PecState *pec; + + /* The PHB backend (PnvPHB3, PnvPHB4 ...) being used */ + Object *backend; +}; + +#define TYPE_PNV_PHB "pnv-phb" +OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE(PnvPHB, PNV_PHB) + +#endif /* PCI_HOST_PNV_PHB_H */
